Pain management in children

Current state of affairs

  • Parents have a tendency
    • to deny the pain
    • or to communicate their anxiety and stress to the child
  • The child
    • wishes to be reassured before and after the care
      • presence of the mother
      • empathy of the practitioner
    • would like to be more informed on the care
  • The practitioner
    • denies pain
    • or does not communicate sufficiently
      • with the parents
      • with the child

Medical acts where pain intervenes

  • Vaccines and blood samples (distresses, stress anticipator).
  • Stitches.
  • Removal of bandages.
  • Otitises (sounding).
  • Care in physiotherapy (where pain forms an integral part of treatment).

Why deal with the pain of the child in the care

  • 18-24 months
    • Vulnerable to pain: no possible verbalisation.
  • 3-7 years
    • described as a rebellious age (rejection of care),
    • expresses pain spontaneously (tears...) from where the assumption that if there is pain, the child will express himself.
  • 7-12
    • are more flexible: easy to reason on the "validity of the care",
    • are in phase of interiorisation, which complicates the expression of pain.
  • 12-15
    • are autonomous: facilitate relation patient/practitioner,
    • have a decency to express their pain.

Means to evaluate pain

Evaluation techniques and tools

  • Intuition is used most of the time in the evaluation of pain, but there are tools for practitioners :
    • verbal scale,
    • analog scale (smiling or sad face),
    • numerical scale (from 1 to 10).
  • For parents
    • they use their intuition
    • they analyse the behaviour of their child
      • cries
      • grimaces

Limits of the means

  • Inaccuracy (scales, intuition).
  • Not very qualitative (scales).

Managing pain

  • Analgesics :
    • Anaesthetic cream or patch,
    • Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories.
  • Paracetamol (after vaccine).
  • Codeine.
  • Psychological care:
    • to reassure,
    • to explain,
    • to encourage.

The relation parent/child/practitioner

There is:
  • a difference in the evaluation of pain by the child compared to that of the parents or the practitioner,
  • a difference in evaluation between the relative and the practitioner.


  • To mitigate ideological cleavage between parents/practitioner on the evaluation of the child's pain.
  • To work with the parents and the practitioners.
  • Promote the fact that pain is "a total phenomenon": to surpass the differences between physical suffering and psychological suffering.
  • To inform in a didactic way:
    • on pain,
    • on the means of evaluation,
    • on antalgic products.
  • To use easy tricks to diminish the pain:
    • reduce standby time (limited nervousness and anxiety),
    • put the child at ease,
      • a distracting dialog,
      • have games, colouring pens at the child's disposal, etc, during the consultation,
      • make the child feel at ease with the medical tools,
      • hide the preparation, the instruments,
    • active participation of the relative,
    • words of encouragement, empathy,
    • to promise a small reward.


Photographic copyright: Beatricekillam |
Ask a question
CCM is a leading international tech website. Our content is written in collaboration with IT experts, under the direction of Jeff Pillou, founder of CCM reaches more than 50 million unique visitors per month and is available in 11 languages.
This document, titled « Pain management in children », is available under the Creative Commons license. Any copy, reuse, or modification of the content should be sufficiently credited to CCM Health (